Mass Media Mind Control in the Casey Anthony Case

This small hub is not intended to fuel that hate or dislike of Casey Anthony. I have an unpopular opinion, and I do know this. However, I am troubled by the Mass Media Mind Control, and I just want to bring a little awareness to the subject.

Sometime, around 1974 the FCC said that subliminal advertising was “subliminal advertising is contrary to the public interest and intended to be deceptive, and that any [tv] station employing them risks losing its liscence”.

Fast forward to 2011………..Many people are wondering why they are so fascinated with the Caysee Anthony Trial. My answer to you an entire new level of Mass Media Mind Control. Propaganda as it were, as defined by Webster’s dictionary, in part:

The spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person

Ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect

I have been one of the few voices, that have all along that have repeatedly stated that the Prosecution in this case did not have any evidence, and that I thought Casey Anthony suffers from Disassociation Identity Disorder (DID). Having never examining her myself, this is just based upon what I have seen and read thus far. It is indeed possible, that I could be wrong.

As an American, you have every right to believe or disbelieve her innocence or guilt. As for myself, I found it very curious that the prosecution never told us how they suspected Casey Anthony killed Caylee:

Where did she get the ingredients for the chloroform?

Where did she mix this alleged concoction?

What did she do with all of the evidence?

Did she do this in the middle of broad daylight with her neighbor’s home?

Why chloroform when there are so many other ready mixed products out there?

Was the chloroform the murder weapon or was it a byproduct of decomposing human remains?

And just way too many unanswered questions to list here. However, the most confusing question that I have is……………….:

If the prosecution was so convinced that she put her baby in a trunk, and then into the woods then way of all charges was the very obvious charge not charged?

I am referring to Improper Disposal of a Human Body. Seems to me that they avoided this charge all together, and so did the media. Seems to me, that this should have been charged right after lying to Law Enforcement.

With all due respect to Mr. Ashton, why would he go on National TV the next day, and say that this case was a Prosecutors Dream….that it was interesting and with all the twists and turns.? Really? I respect the Prosecution, but he left me feeling that this was a fun thing to do, as he smiled about ending his career with “A Prosecutors Dream Case”.

With that said, it is my personal opinion that an accident likely did occur, and Caylee was improperly buried. Again, I know that this is an unpopular opinion, but it is what I believe.

Consider this, approximately 300 children under the age of 4-years old, are murdered each year in this country, and the only one that we are focused on is what the Media has been blaring at us from all angles, on nearly every channel, at every moment that they get.

If you did an Internet Search right now, who will likely find many active cases where either the mother and or father are the alleged murders.

Ask yourself, why the Media Frenzy? What are they trying to distract us from? This Circus, has been a horrifying perfect example on how quickly the Media can control our minds, AKA, Mass Media Mind Control.

I respect each and every person’s right to their own opinion, however, I would urge you in any situation, not too just go blindly with the masses. Form your own opinions, and remember that Media’s prime objective is to get ratings.